Federal Judge Keeps 1,100-Worker Wage Suit Alive Against NY Home Care Company

In a major win for home care workers, a New York federal judge has denied both summary judgment and a bid to decertify a 1,100-member class in a wage and hour lawsuit against Community Care Companions Inc. (CCC), following key arguments advanced by Jessica E. Harris and James Michael Reif of Gladstein, Reif & Meginniss LLP, along with Ian H. Hayes of Hayes Dolce.

The workers, including personal care assistants and home health aides, allege that CCC and its owners, Alexander J. Caro and Mark Gatien, violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York Labor Law by issuing overtime pay late and failing to compensate for travel time and expenses incurred in traveling between client homes.

U.S. District Judge John L. Sinatra Jr. on Monday adopted U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael J. Roemer’s report and recommendation, rejecting CCC’s arguments for decertification and pretrial dismissal of the claims. The ruling allows the class action—filed in 2019—to proceed toward trial.

CCC had argued that a recent state court decision eliminated a private right of action under Section 191 of the New York Labor Law, which covers timely payment of wages. But the court found that conflicting state decisions and federal precedent supported keeping the claim alive.

On the overtime issue, CCC claimed that minor delays in overtime pay—especially when caused by late timesheet submissions—should not qualify as violations. But Judge Roemer found that many of the payment delays were not linked to timesheet problems and emphasized that the legal burden lies with the employer to ensure timely compensation.

The court also rejected CCC’s attempt to dismiss claims related to unpaid travel time between client homes, saying there is “persuasive authority” that such travel constitutes compensable work under federal law and should be decided by a jury.

Read Judge’s Sinatra’s order.

Read Magistrate Judge Roemer’s Report and Recommendation.

Reporting by Law360.

NLRB Judge Finds that NJ Hospital Retaliated Against Nurses; Union Lawyers Secure Key Win

A team of attorneys from Gladstein, Reif & Meginniss LLP—Amelia K. Tuminaro, Jessica E. Harris, and Alicia Graziano—secured a major legal victory for unionized nurses at Clara Maass Medical Center, after a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) judge found the hospital retaliated against staff for protected union activity. The ruling reinforces key protections for union activity and serves as a significant precedent for labor rights in healthcare workplaces.

In a decision issued Friday, Administrative Law Judge Michael A. Rosas ruled that the hospital’s actions—including placing eight nurses on administrative leave, disciplining seven, and firing one—were motivated by “antiunion animus.” The judge ordered Clara Maass to reinstate the terminated nurse, Gloria Eng, and reimburse all affected nurses for lost wages and benefits.

The case centered around an April 2023 incident in which Eng, after being suspended for allegedly restraining a patient during a medical procedure, helped organize a petition and letter signed by about 140 fellow nurses. When Eng and a group of other nurses attempted to deliver the petition to supervisor Bianca Michel, the hospital responded by disciplining the nurses and firing Eng. Judge Rosas ruled that the nurses’ conduct was protected concerted activity and rejected the hospital’s claims that the nurses’ behavior warranted discipline.

The nurses are represented by 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East.

Read the Judge’s decision

Reporting by Law360