Union Urges D.C. Circuit to Uphold NLRB Ruling on Nursing Home’s Unilateral Reduction of Hours

1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East, represented by Jessica Harris and William Massey of Gladstein, Reif & Meginniss, is backing the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in federal appeals court, defending a ruling that found a New Jersey nursing home operator violated labor law by cutting employees’ hours without union consent.

1199SEIU filed a brief with the D.C. Circuit urging the court to enforce the NLRB’s June 2020 decision against 800 River Road Operating Co. LLC, which runs the CareOne facility (also known as Woodcrest Health Care Center) in New Milford, NJ. The union is intervening in the appeal to preserve the board’s finding that the company unlawfully reduced work hours for 20 bargaining unit employees.

According to court filings, the workers had regularly worked 40-hour weeks until mid-2014, when the company unilaterally reduced their schedules to 37.5 hours per week—without notifying or bargaining with the union. The NLRB ruled this was a clear violation of the National Labor Relations Act.

The union argues that payroll records provide strong evidence of the change, showing a consistent drop in weekly hours immediately after the employer’s unilateral move. In its brief, 1199SEIU dismissed the company’s claim that its written policy allowed for hour fluctuations, contending that long-standing practice—not policy documents—determines the employment status quo under labor law. The union also rejected the employer’s claim that the relevant “status quo” should be assessed as of the 2012 union election. Instead, 1199SEIU argued the correct baseline is the period just before the 2014 changes, calling the company’s position “preposterous.”

1199SEIU continues to press for contract negotiations at the facility, where workers have been unionized since 2012 but have yet to secure a collective bargaining agreement.

Read the Union’s brief

Read Law360’s coverage

Judge Upholds Union Arbitration in Major NY Home Care Wage Dispute

A federal judge in New York has confirmed an arbitration decision in favor of 1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East. The decision affects approximately 100,000 home care workers, reinforcing that wage-related disputes under collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) must be resolved through arbitration. 1199SEIU was represented by Laureve Blackstone of Levy Ratner PC and Jim Reif of Gladstein, Reif & Meginniss, LLP.

In his decision, U.S. District Judge John Koeltl upheld an April 2020 arbitration award in a class grievance filed by 1199SEIU against more than 40 home health care companies in New York. The union alleged that the companies failed to properly compensate workers under federal and state labor laws—a claim governed by CBAs in place since 2015.

At the heart of the dispute was whether such wage-related grievances belonged in arbitration. Arbitrator Martin Scheinman ruled they did, and Judge Koeltl confirmed that ruling, rejecting an attempt by eight former home care workers to intervene and block the award.

The former employees, who had ongoing lawsuits against some of the companies, argued they were not bound by the arbitration clause since they left their jobs before the relevant CBA changes took effect. They also contended the arbitration provision should not apply retroactively. Judge Koeltl dismissed those arguments, finding that the CBAs clearly designated arbitration as the forum for such disputes and that the union had authority to negotiate binding agreements on behalf of its members. He emphasized that under well-established legal precedent, courts have limited ability to second-guess arbitration outcomes in labor disputes.

The judge also rejected claims that prior litigation precluded the arbitration outcome, noting that 1199SEIU was not involved in those lawsuits. He further ruled that the arbitration award was final and enforceable, even though it only addressed jurisdiction and arbitrability—not damages or liability.

With this decision, the court reaffirmed the enforceability of union-negotiated arbitration clauses in large-scale labor disputes, even over objections from former employees no longer covered by the CBAs.

Read Judge Koeltl’s decision

Read Law360’s coverage